PetePierson wrote:Keep flip flopping you sad ****ing excuse for a lame imposter.
Well certainly no one will be trying to imitate PetePierson.
Not saying, just saying.
PetePierson wrote:Keep flip flopping you sad ****ing excuse for a lame imposter.
Patrick McIrish wrote:PetePierson wrote:Keep flip flopping you sad ****ing excuse for a lame imposter.
Well certainly no one will be trying to imitate PetePierson.
Not saying, just saying.
uscbucsfan wrote:Patrick McIrish wrote:
Wins DO matter. I know you didn't post this to me but to pretend winning isn't going to change some perspectives is foolish.
Wins do matter, but 2 in a row don't negate the 7 losses, Winston's issues/turnovers, etc. (just from this year).
Some of the Winston defenders act like that.
Winston's never been the only problem, but to point at our "top offense" as something to be prideful in is ignorant to the overall game of complimentary football. Historically QB's giving the ball up at high rates have bad defenses. Winning the turnover battle may be a bit hyperbolic among coach speak, but it is crucial and important.
Winston always seemingly does well when the season is out of reach and we all go into next year with hope.
I don't know how any intelligent football fan would be accepting of throwing money at Winston after what we've seen to this point.
PetePierson wrote:Patrick McIrish wrote:
Well certainly no one will be trying to imitate PetePierson.
Not saying, just saying.
Because it can't be done, you ****ing douche.
Patrick McIrish wrote:PetePierson wrote:
Because it can't be done, you ****ing douche.
Apparently PMI can't be imitated either.....
I wish that was the case with you, unfortunately any trailer park in America has about 7 or 8 PetePierson's in them.
Fat, dumb and bitter is no way to go thru life for most of us.
Enjoy.
Patrick McIrish wrote:
Fair points overall....
Only thing I disagree with (which is cause for me to question agendas) is an opinion that AT NO PRICE should we keep him.
That's just a ridiculous concept, every team in the NFL would take him at the right price! BeliCheat included.
PetePierson wrote:Patrick McIrish wrote:
Apparently PMI can't be imitated either.....
I wish that was the case with you, unfortunately any trailer park in America has about 7 or 8 PetePierson's in them.
Fat, dumb and bitter is no way to go thru life for most of us.
Enjoy.
Clever retort from someone emulating a degenerate gambler that welches and rocks a sweet mullet.
Be better, **** Stick.
PetePierson wrote:Patrick McIrish wrote:
Sorry Pete, I know you hate having a black QB but whoever makes the call I hope that's not the basis for the decision.
Sigh.
Keep flip flopping you sad ****ing excuse for a lame imposter.
Funny thing being the real PMI was a ****ing racist bastard. Obviously, you're not familiar with his rap sheet.
NYBF wrote:PetePierson wrote:
Keep flip flopping you sad ****ing excuse for a lame imposter.
Funny thing being the real PMI was a ****ing racist bastard. Obviously, you're not familiar with his rap sheet.
You must have missed his rants about the coaching staff.
PetePierson wrote:Snake wrote:Bucs rank 23rd in the league in offensive DVOA. Also 23rd in passing DVOA as well.
DN’s favorite... but he won’t acknowledge it.
Patrick McIrish wrote:Patrick McIrish wrote:
Fair points overall....
Only thing I disagree with (which is cause for me to question agendas) is an opinion that AT NO PRICE should we keep him.
That's just a ridiculous concept, every team in the NFL would take him at the right price! BeliCheat included.
How do you respond this this USC? I'm just curious. I know the black QB haters just want him gone, period.
What say you? It's not about risk/reward, your opinion is get his ASS off the team even if he would play for free?
DreadNaught wrote:PetePierson wrote:DN’s favorite... but he won’t acknowledge it.
Can't be top 10 at everything, but I'm glad you're aware of something more than passing yards for a change since that was your favorite stat to slam the defense with when I mentioned their DVOA earlier in the season.
PetePierson wrote:NYBF wrote:
You must have missed his rants about the coaching staff.
No, I saw his "progressive" views. But just like the real PMI; get her cornered and she changed the subject. Now it’s about race instead of the same amount of wins as Fro’man (in more games) and the historic amount of turnovers.
DreadNaught wrote:PetePierson wrote:
No, I saw his "progressive" views. But just like the real PMI; get her cornered and she changed the subject. Now it’s about race instead of the same amount of wins as Fro’man (in more games) and the historic amount of turnovers.
'QB wins' are a casual fan stat.
Favre had a historic amount of turnovers also. So did Peyton his first 5 seasons.
Two of the top QBs in NFL history in your favorite stat of 'QB wins'.
PetePierson wrote:DreadNaught wrote:'QB wins' are a casual fan stat.
Favre had a historic amount of turnovers also. So did Peyton his first 5 seasons.
Two of the top QBs in NFL history in your favorite stat of 'QB wins'.
You got me. Winston is just like Favre and Manning.
Jesus.
beardmcdoug wrote:PetePierson wrote:
You got me. Winston is just like Favre and Manning.
Jesus.
Could be.
But in order for us to find out... we need more time.
uscbucsfan wrote:I said before that I'd be fine to keep him another year, draft lineman, and his replacement.
but I don't want to commit to a long term contract. Not with what I've seen.
DreadNaught wrote:'QB wins' are a casual fan stat.
Favre had a historic amount of turnovers also. So did Peyton his first 5 seasons.
Two of the top QBs in NFL history in your favorite stat of 'QB wins'.
PetePierson wrote:beardmcdoug wrote:
Could be.
But in order for us to find out... we need more time.
You and DN share screen names? Pretty much seem like the same guy.
Terp wrote:This thread is lit... PMI, DD, Bootz and Pete going at it.
Feels nostalgic
Patrick McIrish wrote:Terp wrote:This thread is lit... PMI, DD, Bootz and Pete going at it.
Feels nostalgic
I don't go at it with anyone, I go at it with opinions. I let others get upset, life's too short.
Most others are concerned if they agree or disagree with the right poster, their pal, I focus on WHAT is said, not WHO says it.
Bootz could be an idiot one post, spot on the next. Dread the same.
Yes, Pete is consistently an idiot but if he ever gets one right I'll be right there to congratulate him as well.
It's about the Bucs, not us.
We move on.
Terp wrote:The Super Bowl wins and playoff appearances probably helped.
No I’m sure it’s because they were white.
Patrick McIrish wrote:How do you respond this this USC? I'm just curious. I know the black QB haters just want him gone, period.
What say you? It's not about risk/reward, your opinion is get his ASS off the team even if he would play for free?
Patrick McIrish wrote:Sorry Pete, I know you hate having a black QB but whoever makes the call I hope that's not the basis for the decision.
Sigh.
Patrick McIrish wrote:Manning and Favre appeared and won the same amount of SB's as Winston has in their first 5 years.
It's sports, I don't look at skin color. Only the uneducated do things like that.
It's why I think it's laughable when the casuals consider Gruden a better coach than Dungy......
He's not and it ain't close. Been very vocal through the years.
And it's why when we have all 4 minority coaches I have to question if BA is focused on winning football games or being man of the year.
I still like BA but looking over the resume of these hires I have to question what my eyes are telling me.
I could give a **** about race, just want to win boys, that's my one and only agenda (since stealing this user name).
Users browsing this forum: LavonteDavid54 and 26 guests