Draft Watch: Running Backs

Dedicated to College Football and Draft discussion.
post

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:36 pm

Got one.
Last edited by mdb1958 on Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:37 pm

Bootz2004 wrote:
mdb1958 wrote:
I think


You shouldn't. Ever, *****.



Image
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Doctor » Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:32 pm

Unless Barkley somehow makes it to us at 7, which is unlikely, and we draft him.... I have to think we're going RB in round 2. This class is just nasty and the talent is superb. Fitz, Nelson, or Chubb and Guice or Michels and I'll walk away super happy.
Image
User avatar
Doctor
 
Posts: 5338
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:54 pm
Location: Out of the Office. Will return next Fall.
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 159 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:07 pm

Doctor wrote:Unless Barkley somehow makes it to us at 7, which is unlikely, and we draft him.... I have to think we're going RB in round 2. This class is just nasty and the talent is superb. Fitz, Nelson, or Chubb and Guice or Michels and I'll walk away super happy.



So whoever picks them will have a winning record and they will all get a thousand, or is that to high for superb?
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Sat Feb 17, 2018 8:17 am

Scott Smith - There have been 42 running backs taken in the top 10 of the second round since the 1970 merger, and no team has done that more often than the Buccaneers and their six picks.


More than anyone else ehh. You mean all the teams successfully going to the playoffs did it less than us? How could they be so stupid?
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby real bucs fan » Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:25 am

Doctor wrote:Unless Barkley somehow makes it to us at 7, which is unlikely, and we draft him.... I have to think we're going RB in round 2. This class is just nasty and the talent is superb. Fitz, Nelson, or Chubb and Guice or Michels and I'll walk away super happy.

Ya I think rd2 is the sweet spot. There's a small chance Guice will be there, but at the least one of Michel or Ronald Jones will. Not the biggest Ronald Jones fan, so I hope it's Michel, but after Jones it starts to get iffy. Can't gamble on Penny making it to our 3rd, and I don't really like anyone in this class beyond that. I think Jones in the least could be a nice complement to Barber. He can bring big play ability and speed to our backfield, while Barber can do the heavy lifting.
Image
real bucs fan
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:59 pm
Has thanked: 961 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Super K » Sat Feb 17, 2018 12:50 pm

mdb1958 wrote:
Scott Smith - There have been 42 running backs taken in the top 10 of the second round since the 1970 merger, and no team has done that more often than the Buccaneers and their six picks.


More than anyone else ehh. You mean all the teams successfully going to the playoffs did it less than us? How could they be so stupid?


Lol...


Good call Mdb..

And I agree with you, RB can wait...
User avatar
Super K
 
Posts: 7773
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 231 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:03 pm

Super K wrote:
mdb1958 wrote:
More than anyone else ehh. You mean all the teams successfully going to the playoffs did it less than us? How could they be so stupid?


Lol...


Good call Mdb..

And I agree with you, RB can wait...


There is a history of wanting and agreeing with who the team picks, but it has a very short shelf life, then it becomes what the hell was the team thinking...
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Doctor » Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:06 pm

mdb1958 wrote:
Doctor wrote:Unless Barkley somehow makes it to us at 7, which is unlikely, and we draft him.... I have to think we're going RB in round 2. This class is just nasty and the talent is superb. Fitz, Nelson, or Chubb and Guice or Michels and I'll walk away super happy.



So whoever picks them will have a winning record and they will all get a thousand, or is that to high for superb?

Well, idk about winning records. There's so many other factors that go into that. The same RB can go to the Seahawks and be a winner but also go to the Browns and be a loser. But crack 1000? I'd say yes. How many rookie RB cracked 1000 total this year? Like 4 or 5? I think this class could match that.
Image
User avatar
Doctor
 
Posts: 5338
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:54 pm
Location: Out of the Office. Will return next Fall.
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 159 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:10 pm

Doctor wrote:
mdb1958 wrote:

So whoever picks them will have a winning record and they will all get a thousand, or is that to high for superb?

Well, idk about winning records. There's so many other factors that go into that. The same RB can go to the Seahawks and be a winner but also go to the Browns and be a loser. But crack 1000? I'd say yes. How many rookie RB cracked 1000 total this year? Like 4 or 5? I think this class could match that.





2 - Hunt and Fournette
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby MJW » Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:00 pm

I think if we seriously upgrade left guard (be it Norwell, Pugh, Nelson, whoever), continue to grow Ali Marpet, and get JR Sweezy back in Seahawks form, Peyton Barber could top 1,000 yards. By Thanksgiving.

If you can run block, you can run.
Image
User avatar
MJW
 
Posts: 9028
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:17 am
Location: Nebraska
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Nano » Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:09 pm

MJW wrote:I think if we seriously upgrade left guard (be it Norwell, Pugh, Nelson, whoever), continue to grow Ali Marpet, and get JR Sweezy back in Seahawks form, Peyton Barber could top 1,000 yards. By Thanksgiving.

If you can run block, you can run.

I guess that's assuming that we don't give up on the running game by HT every week because Winston turned the ball over 50 times and we're down by 2 scores
User avatar
Nano
 
Posts: 7851
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:30 pm
Location: Somewhere above Tampa
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby terrytate » Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:07 am

Nano wrote:
MJW wrote:I think if we seriously upgrade left guard (be it Norwell, Pugh, Nelson, whoever), continue to grow Ali Marpet, and get JR Sweezy back in Seahawks form, Peyton Barber could top 1,000 yards. By Thanksgiving.

If you can run block, you can run.

I guess that's assuming that we don't give up on the running game by HT every week because Winston turned the ball over 50 times and we're down by 2 scores


Winston looks so much better when he has a running game that makes people buy his play action.
User avatar
terrytate
 
Posts: 2531
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:49 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:44 am

RBF will tell you, its coming down to only 3 or 4 in the world that will be good enough to tote the rock for us this year, all the rest are inferior wanna be's...
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:47 am

He will readily admit that the entire population of Canada has no one that could perform that duty.
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby real bucs fan » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:18 am

If you'd prefer to gamble another season on the likes of Jeremy McNichols, by all means, preach it... I just hope Licht has another idea...
Image
real bucs fan
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:59 pm
Has thanked: 961 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Bootz2004 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:28 am

real bucs fan wrote:If you'd prefer to gamble another season on the likes of Jeremy McNichols, by all means, preach it... I just hope Licht has another idea...


A what round in the draft do RBs stop being "studs"?
User avatar
Bootz2004
 
Posts: 24976
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:17 pm
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 529 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby real bucs fan » Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:36 pm

Bootz2004 wrote:
real bucs fan wrote:If you'd prefer to gamble another season on the likes of Jeremy McNichols, by all means, preach it... I just hope Licht has another idea...


A what round in the draft do RBs stop being "studs"?

In my opinion, there are 3 guys in this draft that I think could be counted on to be studs in our backfield- Barkley, Guice, and Sony Michel. Ronald Jones is also intriguing as he has some Kamara qualities. The other backs in this draft aren't upgrades on Peyton Barber IMO.
Image
real bucs fan
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:59 pm
Has thanked: 961 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Bootz2004 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:38 pm

real bucs fan wrote:
Bootz2004 wrote:
A what round in the draft do RBs stop being "studs"?

In my opinion, there are 3 guys in this draft that I think could be counted on to be studs in our backfield- Barkley, Guice, and Sony Michel. Ronald Jones is also intriguing as he has some Kamara qualities. The other backs in this draft aren't upgrades on Peyton Barber IMO.


LOL! Okay buddy.
User avatar
Bootz2004
 
Posts: 24976
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:17 pm
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 529 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby MJW » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:39 am

real bucs fan wrote:If you'd prefer to gamble another season on the likes of Jeremy McNichols, by all means, preach it... I just hope Licht has another idea...


Barber is a perfectly fine idea, if we block for him.

Also...McNichols was a huge bust, in large part because he was the rare NFL prospect who absolutely couldn't read a playbook. Using him as an example of why mid-late round running backs are a bad idea is a losing proposition. We could have taken Aaron Jones or Corey Clement with that pick also.
Image
User avatar
MJW
 
Posts: 9028
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:17 am
Location: Nebraska
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Mountaineer Buc » Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:49 pm

I just want to take a minute and marvel at the 233lbs Barkley reportedly weighed in at today.

If he runs 4.3 at that weight, just wow.
Image
User avatar
Mountaineer Buc
 
Posts: 14383
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:15 pm
Location: Crestucky
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 666 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby DreadNaught » Wed Feb 28, 2018 4:36 pm

Mountaineer Buc wrote:I just want to take a minute and marvel at the 233lbs Barkley reportedly weighed in at today.

If he runs 4.3 at that weight, just wow.


RBF is bi-posting!!!
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 13580
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am
Has thanked: 550 times
Been thanked: 589 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby real bucs fan » Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:38 pm

I think anything under 4.50 would be amazing.
Image
real bucs fan
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:59 pm
Has thanked: 961 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Cheb » Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:51 pm

He runs fast in pads on the field being chased by angry defenders. Who cares how fast he is on a track in shorts?
Image
Cheb
 
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:00 pm
Location: West Coast is best coast
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 366 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Mountaineer Buc » Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:14 pm

Cheb wrote:He runs fast in pads on the field being chased by angry defenders. Who cares how fast he is on a track in shorts?

Its just propelling that kind of bodyweight at that kind of speed.

Dude's a freak.
Image
User avatar
Mountaineer Buc
 
Posts: 14383
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:15 pm
Location: Crestucky
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 666 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:47 pm

If we let the other team score faster we can watch him play more. Jeesh!
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby MJW » Thu Mar 01, 2018 12:56 am

229 Pounds.
4.45 Forty.
25 Bench Press Reps.

Sorry, I was thinking about Trent Richardson. What were you guys talking about?
Image
User avatar
MJW
 
Posts: 9028
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:17 am
Location: Nebraska
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby MJW » Thu Mar 01, 2018 12:59 am

Meanwhile, the NFL's leading rusher goes 5'10 215 and ran a 4.62 at the combine last year after a good career in the MAC.
Image
User avatar
MJW
 
Posts: 9028
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:17 am
Location: Nebraska
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby mdb1958 » Sat Mar 03, 2018 3:32 pm

Chase Edmonds, Fordham. The small-school prospects typically need a big combine effort to catapult up draft boards. Edmonds did just that. At a compact 5-foot-9 and 205 pounds, he ran 4.53 40, had a 34-inch vertical and 10-foot-2 broad jump, and dazzled with a 6.79-second time in the vital three-cone drill, the best among running backs in attendance. The shifty back with impressive acceleration helped himself a great deal today.
mdb1958
 
Posts: 10143
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Watch: Running Backs

Postby Cheb » Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:15 pm

Every draft year, I closely follow the walterfootball prospect visits tracker. Basically, they take all the information they hear about what team is meeting with what prospect and when, then compile it into a grand list. It's as close as we mere mortals can get to who the Bucs are actually interested in, and it's a close approximation of who they actually draft. Every year for the past four years, at least two of the guys we drafted were on that list. I can go back through my prior posts to nail who exactly they were, but suffice to say it's as close to reliable as we can get, in my opinion.

Take a guess on who the only running back on that list is. Go on, guess who it is.

You're wrong.

It's Akrum Wadley from Iowa. He's been a thorn in the Big Ten's side his whole career. He has juice for days, a jitterbug who can create yards for himself with his wiggle and burst. Yeah, he's a bit small, so yeah, he isn't going to be an everydown back, but he'd be a great member of the rotation and I'd love to see him in Tampa. On his better snaps, he looks like Le'veon Bell's kid brother.

At the combine, he ran a 4.54 40 yard dash, with 12 bench reps and a 32" vertical leap. I would have expected him to test far better than that, given his on-field abilities, and if he falls to the fourth I think he would represent great value.
Image
Cheb
 
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:00 pm
Location: West Coast is best coast
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 366 times

PreviousNext

post

Return to College Football/Draft Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron