Random terrorism news

A Place to respectfully discuss those topics that you should never discuss.
post

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby bucfanclw » Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:39 am

DreadNaught wrote:Another incident of 'cultural enrichment' today in Europe. This is the 6th vehicular terror attack since Nice, France last July.

A large beer truck plowed into a crowd at a shopping center in central Stockholm, killing at least three people and injuring several on Friday, Swedish police said. At least one person has been arrested, according to Prime Minister Stefan Lofven, who called the crash a terror attack. "Sweden has been attacked," Lofven said. "This indicates that it is an act of terror." There was no immediate claim of responsibility for Friday's attack, but vehicles have been common weapons in recent extremist attacks.

Did the beer at least make it to its destination?
User avatar
bucfanclw
 
Posts: 2104
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby HamBone » Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:23 am

At least 38 people have been killed following two suspected suicide bombings at Coptic Christian services, Egypt's state television reported.

The first attack struck worshippers at a church in Tanta, outside Cairo. The second blast detonated outside the front doors of a church in Alexandria after three hero police officers prevented a suicide bomber from accessing the building.
HamBone
 
Posts: 1599
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:34 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby mdb1958 » Tue Apr 11, 2017 6:47 am

I'm saddened by the amount of Americans that want to see how many people can get to our country to blow up people.
mdb1958
 
Posts: 5360
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby DreadNaught » Tue Apr 11, 2017 8:17 am

HamBone wrote:At least 38 people have been killed following two suspected suicide bombings at Coptic Christian services, Egypt's state television reported.

The first attack struck worshippers at a church in Tanta, outside Cairo. The second blast detonated outside the front doors of a church in Alexandria after three hero police officers prevented a suicide bomber from accessing the building.


Muslim extremists target Christian church on Palm Sunday. ISIS has claimed responsibility.
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby bucfanclw » Tue Apr 11, 2017 8:30 am

This is why we need a travel ban. Those people that got attacked and try to come here for the safety of their families are clearly terrorists. Keep them out.
User avatar
bucfanclw
 
Posts: 2104
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby mightyleemoon » Tue Apr 11, 2017 10:21 am

mdb1958 wrote:I'm saddened by the amount of Americans that want to see how many people can get to our country to blow up people.


I've never even heard of one American who wants that. You hang around some weird Americans.
User avatar
mightyleemoon
 
Posts: 2734
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:35 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby Ken Carson » Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:26 am

bucfanclw wrote:This is why we need a travel ban. Those people that got attacked and try to come here for the safety of their families are clearly terrorists. Keep them out.

Weren't people angry that Coptic Christians were potentially going to be prioritized as refugees?
Image
Ken Carson
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:33 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby bucfanclw » Thu Apr 13, 2017 11:20 am

Ken Carson wrote:
bucfanclw wrote:This is why we need a travel ban. Those people that got attacked and try to come here for the safety of their families are clearly terrorists. Keep them out.

Weren't people angry that Coptic Christians were potentially going to be prioritized as refugees?

So it's either we block everyone, or we give priority to some based on what they claim their religious belief is? I didn't realize those were the only options. Sorry.
User avatar
bucfanclw
 
Posts: 2104
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby DreadNaught » Thu Apr 13, 2017 11:50 am

bucfanclw wrote:
Ken Carson wrote:Weren't people angry that Coptic Christians were potentially going to be prioritized as refugees?

So it's either we block everyone, or we give priority to some based on what they claim their religious belief is? I didn't realize those were the only options. Sorry.


lol, nice straw man ^^^

What's wrong with giving those refugees in the most danger a priority? You just stated they are not safe, right?

So what option do you support? It would seem you're opposed to anything that doesn't allow people who "claim" to be refugees unvetted access to America. Even ones from countries that are state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify these refugees.
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby bucfanclw » Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:02 pm

DreadNaught wrote:
bucfanclw wrote:So it's either we block everyone, or we give priority to some based on what they claim their religious belief is? I didn't realize those were the only options. Sorry.


lol, nice straw man ^^^

What's wrong with giving those refugees in the most danger a priority? You just stated they are not safe, right?

So what option do you support? It would seem you're opposed to anything that doesn't allow people who "claim" to be refugees unvetted access to America. Even ones from countries that are state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify these refugees.

So if a Muslim person wanted to get out of Syria to protect their family, they should get in line behind the ones that claim to be Christian in an attempt to find refuge in a country that was founded on the idea of religious freedom? Because that's what you're saying when you say Christians should get priority.

And where have I ever said I want them to come in unvetted?
User avatar
bucfanclw
 
Posts: 2104
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby deltbucs » Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:52 pm

DreadNaught wrote:
bucfanclw wrote:So it's either we block everyone, or we give priority to some based on what they claim their religious belief is? I didn't realize those were the only options. Sorry.


lol, nice straw man ^^^

What's wrong with giving those refugees in the most danger a priority? You just stated they are not safe, right?

So what option do you support? It would seem you're opposed to anything that doesn't allow people who "claim" to be refugees unvetted access to America. Even ones from countries that are state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify these refugees.

Ironic irony is ironic.
Image
deltbucs
 
Posts: 2898
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:28 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby Ken Carson » Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:17 pm

bucfanclw wrote:
DreadNaught wrote:
lol, nice straw man ^^^

What's wrong with giving those refugees in the most danger a priority? You just stated they are not safe, right?

So what option do you support? It would seem you're opposed to anything that doesn't allow people who "claim" to be refugees unvetted access to America. Even ones from countries that are state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify these refugees.

So if a Muslim person wanted to get out of Syria to protect their family, they should get in line behind the ones that claim to be Christian in an attempt to find refuge in a country that was founded on the idea of religious freedom? Because that's what you're saying when you say Christians should get priority.

And where have I ever said I want them to come in unvetted?

Christians in the Middle East are by definition less safe than Muslims. Saying you are a Christian is akin to cultural suicide in many Muslim countries, as Christians are decidedly a lower class of citizen.
Last edited by Ken Carson on Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Ken Carson
 
Posts: 1933
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:33 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby DreadNaught » Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:30 pm

deltbucs wrote:
DreadNaught wrote:
lol, nice straw man ^^^

What's wrong with giving those refugees in the most danger a priority? You just stated they are not safe, right?

So what option do you support? It would seem you're opposed to anything that doesn't allow people who "claim" to be refugees unvetted access to America. Even ones from countries that are state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify these refugees.

Ironic irony is ironic.


I'm asking a question since he opposed the temporary travel ban that would have allowed the US government to vet people coming from countries that are either state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify people.

I even prefaced the part you bolded by asking what his actual position is since he's playing all sides.

If my assumption is incorrect I'm sure clw is big boy and can answer. Again, I'm asking for clarification and wasn't making an argument since I've stated my point previously.
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby bucfanclw » Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:13 pm

DreadNaught wrote:
deltbucs wrote:Ironic irony is ironic.


I'm asking a question since he opposed the temporary travel ban that would have allowed the US government to vet people coming from countries that are either state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify people.

I even prefaced the part you bolded by asking what his actual position is since he's playing all sides.

If my assumption is incorrect I'm sure clw is big boy and can answer. Again, I'm asking for clarification and wasn't making an argument since I've stated my point previously.

I'll answer slowly so maybe you can pick it up this time...

We... already... vet... refugees.

A travel ban did absolutely nothing to change the process except tell people that were legally travelling they're S.O.L. until somebody could explain the process to Trump. You caught up there, Sunshine?
User avatar
bucfanclw
 
Posts: 2104
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby deltbucs » Thu Apr 13, 2017 11:11 pm

DreadNaught wrote:
deltbucs wrote:Ironic irony is ironic.


I'm asking a question since he opposed the temporary travel ban that would have allowed the US government to vet people coming from countries that are either state sponsors of terrorism and/or lack the infrastructure to identify people.

I even prefaced the part you bolded by asking what his actual position is since he's playing all sides.

If my assumption is incorrect I'm sure clw is big boy and can answer. Again, I'm asking for clarification and wasn't making an argument since I've stated my point previously.

Like clw said, we already vet refugees.

Since you actually believe the nonsense that president orange-faced ***** spews, how has he not figured out how to properly vet refugees yet? How has someone who "has the best brain" and is "the best at military" and "knows more about ISIS than the generals" not figured out how to properly vet them? Why do we need a travel ban?
Image
deltbucs
 
Posts: 2898
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:28 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby RedLeader » Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:29 am

Somehow, I trust a ban more than our government trying to vet anything, or anyone.

Ban them all I say. Starting with clewiston and company... ;)
User avatar
RedLeader
 
Posts: 1329
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 3:27 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby Buc2 » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:05 am

Image
Image
Don't tread on me
User avatar
Buc2
 
Posts: 5787
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:16 pm
Location: America

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby beardmcdoug » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:14 am

who are these antifa people... buncha rudderless edgelord neets "fighting the bad guys"... give me a break...
User avatar
beardmcdoug
 
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:30 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby mdb1958 » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:38 am

RedLeader wrote:Somehow, I trust a ban more than our government trying to vet anything, or anyone.

Ban them all I say. Starting with clewiston and company... ;)


There's a few in here that would cry out "we love ya man", only to hear you are a dog that will lose its head.
mdb1958
 
Posts: 5360
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:11 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby mightyleemoon » Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:49 am

beardmcdoug wrote:who are these antifa people... buncha rudderless edgelord neets "fighting the bad guys"... give me a break...


They're a bunch of a-political douchebags who hate conservatives.

Think of them as the other side of the coin as the a-political redneck shitbags who hate gays.
User avatar
mightyleemoon
 
Posts: 2734
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:35 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby DreadNaught » Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:56 am

beardmcdoug wrote:who are these antifa people... buncha rudderless edgelord neets "fighting the bad guys"... give me a break...


Many of them are strongly anti capitalism, and the same people behind the pro-socialism/pro-communism groups. It's really ironic (at least to me) that they are 'Anti-Fascist', yet every actual fascist has ruled via communism or socialism.

Many them are misguided kids, which is sad b/c some are getting felony convictions for taking part in this nonsense.

Protesting is great. But when you're covering your face and/or destroying property you're a common criminal despite your 'cause' and should be dealt with accordingly.
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby beardmcdoug » Mon Apr 17, 2017 9:24 am

right?

as well they should be getting charged... you see that ***** hit the guy over the head with the u-bolt? guy in a red shirt was standing around talking between the groups - even had his hands up in the beginning and some masked little bitch runs up and clocks him on the top of the head... could have caved his skull in and killed the guy. jesus that pissed me off


edit, video (slight warning - sort of shocking for a monday morning):

User avatar
beardmcdoug
 
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:30 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby deltbucs » Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:52 pm

Holy ****! The mainstream media is printing something other than what they are forced to print!

MIT expert claims latest chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged

https://www.yahoo.com/news/mit-expert-c ... 19428.html


I wish this stuff made it to people thinking about joining the military....and I wish voters realized that they are getting played.
Image
deltbucs
 
Posts: 2898
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:28 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby beardmcdoug » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:02 pm

deltbucs wrote:Holy ****! The mainstream media is printing something other than what they are forced to print!

MIT expert claims latest chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged

https://www.yahoo.com/news/mit-expert-c ... 19428.html


I wish this stuff made it to people thinking about joining the military....and I wish voters realized that they are getting played.


how dare you Delt!? how dare you even suggest a scientific, evidence-based analysis should be brought into consideration!? Didn't you see the pictures?! Think of the babies! Bomb them now!!

guess you're just another tin foil hat wearing drumpf support hur hur
User avatar
beardmcdoug
 
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:30 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby PrimeMinister » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:06 pm

deltbucs wrote:Holy ****! The mainstream media is printing something other than what they are forced to print!

MIT expert claims latest chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged

https://www.yahoo.com/news/mit-expert-c ... 19428.html


I wish this stuff made it to people thinking about joining the military....and I wish voters realized that they are getting played.


All of this feels like a replay of WMDs.
PrimeMinister
 
Posts: 4654
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:34 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby bucfanclw » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:16 pm

beardmcdoug wrote:
deltbucs wrote:Holy ****! The mainstream media is printing something other than what they are forced to print!


https://www.yahoo.com/news/mit-expert-c ... 19428.html


I wish this stuff made it to people thinking about joining the military....and I wish voters realized that they are getting played.


how dare you Delt!? how dare you even suggest a scientific, evidence-based analysis should be brought into consideration!? Didn't you see the pictures?! Think of the babies! Bomb them now!!

guess you're just another tin foil hat wearing drumpf support hur hur

I take that guy's assessments with a handful of salt. He's got a history of anti-American military "findings" that are typically based of YouTube videos and he collaborates with Infowars and RT. Not saying he's not right here, but he seems to have motives.
User avatar
bucfanclw
 
Posts: 2104
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby DreadNaught » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:17 pm

deltbucs wrote:and I wish voters realized that they are getting played.


Do you mean "voters here in the political section of BucZone"?

We get it, this is like the hundredth time you've posted some iteration of that statement here on this same board.

If your "wish" is to get voters to realize your message then from a touchpoint perspective perhaps you should post it more on various internet channels instead of repeating it here over and over on the same football MB sub-forum. I mean there are only a handful of us that make up your target audience here, and it's fair to say you've saturated the audience with this message and you're just talking to yourself here at this point. Just trying to help your wish become reality. :D

As for here at BZ, maybe incorporate it into your sig template that way it's there everytime you post?
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby deltbucs » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:23 pm

DreadNaught wrote:
deltbucs wrote:and I wish voters realized that they are getting played.


Do you mean "voters here in the political section of BucZone"?

We get it, this is like the hundredth time you've posted some iteration of that statement here on this same board.

If your "wish" is to get voters to realize your message then from a touchpoint perspective perhaps you should post it more on various internet channels instead of repeating it here over and over on the same football MB sub-forum. I mean there are only a handful of us that make up your target audience here, and it's fair to say you've saturated the audience with this message and you're just talking to yourself here at this point. Just trying to help your wish become reality. :D

As for here at BZ, maybe incorporate it into your sig template that way it's there everytime you post?

I know your hypersensitive about voting for the Don the con and probably a bit frustrated that it's become impossible to defend him, but this isn't about him or you. This is about Washington as a whole. If you read the article you would see how the professor talks about how we made this **** up when Obama was in office, too.

Again...I'm very surprised that a media source as mainstream as Yahoo would print this.
Image
deltbucs
 
Posts: 2898
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:28 pm

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby DreadNaught » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:25 pm

bucfanclw wrote:
beardmcdoug wrote:
how dare you Delt!? how dare you even suggest a scientific, evidence-based analysis should be brought into consideration!? Didn't you see the pictures?! Think of the babies! Bomb them now!!

guess you're just another tin foil hat wearing drumpf support hur hur

I take that guy's assessments with a handful of salt. He's got a history of anti-American military "findings" that are typically based of YouTube videos and he collaborates with Infowars and RT. Not saying he's not right here, but he seems to have motives.


Collaborates w/ Infowars and RT? Someone get a rope so we can hang that TRAITOR!!!

Why not just be consistent and call him a conspiracy theorist? Has something changed since last week?
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am

Re: Random terrorism news

Postby DreadNaught » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:29 pm

deltbucs wrote:
DreadNaught wrote:
Do you mean "voters here in the political section of BucZone"?

We get it, this is like the hundredth time you've posted some iteration of that statement here on this same board.

If your "wish" is to get voters to realize your message then from a touchpoint perspective perhaps you should post it more on various internet channels instead of repeating it here over and over on the same football MB sub-forum. I mean there are only a handful of us that make up your target audience here, and it's fair to say you've saturated the audience with this message and you're just talking to yourself here at this point. Just trying to help your wish become reality. :D

As for here at BZ, maybe incorporate it into your sig template that way it's there everytime you post?

I know your hypersensitive about voting for the Don the con and probably a bit frustrated that it's become impossible to defend him, but this isn't about him or you. This is about Washington as a whole. If you read the article you would see how the professor talks about how we made this **** up when Obama was in office, too.

Again...I'm very surprised that a media source as mainstream as Yahoo would print this.


I confused your hatred of Trump and hatred of establishment politics here I suppose. But they are merging on the Syria CW issue so it's a delt double whammy.

On this issue you're preaching to the choir, I was the first person here to question the legitimacy of the CW attack iirc. When I did so and stated the coverage didn't smell right and we should know what the evidence was I got called a conspiracy theorist.

And fwiw, I'll defend Trump on some things. Like immigration, the Trump-Russia falsehoods, etc. But regime change in Syria is a total establishment move I never supported and won't now just b/c Trump says so. As terrible as Trump may be to you and others, to me, he'll always be better than Hillary. But there are a million other people that I could say that about so it's not really an endorsement as much as it's a jab.
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am

PreviousNext

post

Return to Politics and Religion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests