deltbucs wrote: DreadNaught wrote:
Do you mean "voters here in the political section of BucZone"?
We get it, this is like the hundredth time you've posted some iteration of that statement here on this same board.
If your "wish" is to get voters to realize your message then from a touchpoint perspective perhaps you should post it more on various internet channels instead of repeating it here over and over on the same football MB sub-forum. I mean there are only a handful of us that make up your target audience here, and it's fair to say you've saturated the audience with this message and you're just talking to yourself here at this point. Just trying to help your wish become reality.
As for here at BZ, maybe incorporate it into your sig template that way it's there everytime you post?
I know your hypersensitive about voting for the Don the con and probably a bit frustrated that it's become impossible to defend him, but this isn't about him or you. This is about Washington as a whole. If you read the article you would see how the professor talks about how we made this **** up when Obama was in office, too.
Again...I'm very surprised that a media source as mainstream as Yahoo would print this.
I confused your hatred of Trump and hatred of establishment politics here I suppose. But they are merging on the Syria CW issue so it's a delt double whammy.
On this issue you're preaching to the choir, I was the first person here to question the legitimacy of the CW attack iirc. When I did so and stated the coverage didn't smell right and we should know what the evidence was I got called a conspiracy theorist.
And fwiw, I'll defend Trump on some things. Like immigration, the Trump-Russia falsehoods, etc. But regime change in Syria is a total establishment move I never supported and won't now just b/c Trump says so. As terrible as Trump may be to you and others, to me, he'll always be better than Hillary. But there are a million other people that I could say that about so it's not really an endorsement as much as it's a jab.