College Football Playoff Selection

Dedicated to College Football and Draft discussion.
post

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby uscbucsfan » Mon Oct 08, 2018 8:51 pm

ND almost lost to the worst team in the SEC. Clemson struggled without Lawrence, but they were not getting beat bad before TL went down to Syracuse. It was 13-7. It happens, just like to ND.

Clemson and ND have each beaten 1 opponent that is currently ranked. They both have a cake walk remaining. Clemson actually has a better remaining schedule with potentially 2 ranked teams. If Clemson wins out they are in, easily. Unless OSU goes undefeated, which they have the least likely chance IMO, they would be the 2 seed. Who would pass them?
Image
User avatar
uscbucsfan
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 113 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby NavyBuc » Mon Oct 08, 2018 9:04 pm

uscbucsfan wrote:ND almost lost to the worst team in the SEC. Clemson struggled without Lawrence, but they were not getting beat bad before TL went down to Syracuse. It was 13-7. It happens, just like to ND.

Clemson and ND have each beaten 1 opponent that is currently ranked. They both have a cake walk remaining. Clemson actually has a better remaining schedule with potentially 2 ranked teams. If Clemson wins out they are in, easily. Unless OSU goes undefeated, which they have the least likely chance IMO, they would be the 2 seed. Who would pass them?


ND played Vandy with Brandon Wimbush at qb. If Ian Book plays, ND destroys Vandy. They're a much different team with the new qb. Much better offensively. They'd prolly lose to VT with Wimbush.

I don't know. I've watched a lot of football, including ND, Clemson, Ohio State and 'Bama. I'm just really with impressed with Notre Dame. They have a lot of skilled players on both sides of the ball that are NFL-caliber. They have big, physical receivers and Book at qb makes them a threat. And Dexter Williams is one of the more explosive backs in football. Defensively, they're one of the better units in college, as evidenced by the way they shut down Michigan and controlled Brice Love. They're not Alabama or Georgia, but I would say they could beat anyone else.
NavyBuc
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:07 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby uscbucsfan » Mon Oct 08, 2018 9:10 pm

NavyBuc wrote:
uscbucsfan wrote:ND almost lost to the worst team in the SEC. Clemson struggled without Lawrence, but they were not getting beat bad before TL went down to Syracuse. It was 13-7. It happens, just like to ND.

Clemson and ND have each beaten 1 opponent that is currently ranked. They both have a cake walk remaining. Clemson actually has a better remaining schedule with potentially 2 ranked teams. If Clemson wins out they are in, easily. Unless OSU goes undefeated, which they have the least likely chance IMO, they would be the 2 seed. Who would pass them?


ND played Vandy with Brandon Wimbush at qb. If Ian Book plays, ND destroys Vandy. They're a much different team with the new qb. Much better offensively. They'd prolly lose to VT with Wimbush.

I don't know. I've watched a lot of football, including ND, Clemson, Ohio State and 'Bama. I'm just really with impressed with Notre Dame. They have a lot of skilled players on both sides of the ball that are NFL-caliber. They have big, physical receivers and Book at qb makes them a threat. And Dexter Williams is one of the more explosive backs in football. Defensively, they're one of the better units in college, as evidenced by the way they shut down Michigan and controlled Brice Love. They're not Alabama or Georgia, but I would say they could beat anyone else.

You're also a ND fan and have always touted them.

I don't think they are bad, I just don't think they are elite. Clemson has been up and down and I hate them more than any other sports team, but at their best this season they are in that top elite echelon on both sides of the ball.
Image
User avatar
uscbucsfan
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 113 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby NavyBuc » Mon Oct 08, 2018 9:40 pm

uscbucsfan wrote:
NavyBuc wrote:
ND played Vandy with Brandon Wimbush at qb. If Ian Book plays, ND destroys Vandy. They're a much different team with the new qb. Much better offensively. They'd prolly lose to VT with Wimbush.

I don't know. I've watched a lot of football, including ND, Clemson, Ohio State and 'Bama. I'm just really with impressed with Notre Dame. They have a lot of skilled players on both sides of the ball that are NFL-caliber. They have big, physical receivers and Book at qb makes them a threat. And Dexter Williams is one of the more explosive backs in football. Defensively, they're one of the better units in college, as evidenced by the way they shut down Michigan and controlled Brice Love. They're not Alabama or Georgia, but I would say they could beat anyone else.

You're also a ND fan and have always touted them.

I don't think they are bad, I just don't think they are elite. Clemson has been up and down and I hate them more than any other sports team, but at their best this season they are in that top elite echelon on both sides of the ball.


haha I definitely would not call myself a Notre Dame fan, but I do respect them. I hate Brian Kelly. Good coach, but arrogant jerk. However, like all Navy fans, we don't mind Notre Dame. Friendly rivals who we respect. I will stick up for them, but a lot of time it's just to play devil's advocate. I'm more of a Penn State guy.

I agree that they're not elite. If they played Alabama, they'd get spanked. But outside of 'Bama and maybe Georgia, there aren't any elite or great teams this year, IMO. That's why I think ND fits in along with OSU and Clemson as probably the 3rd best team in football.
NavyBuc
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:07 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Zarniwoop » Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:16 pm

New Polls:

1. Alabama
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. Notre Dame
5. LSU
6. Michigan
7. Texas
8. Georgia
9. Oklahoma
10. UCF


That's the AP poll. The 6 through 10 teams in are in a bit different order in the coaches poll
Zarniwoop
 
Posts: 6476
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Ken Carson » Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:33 pm

Anyone else see that bullshit note that ESPN kept attaching to LSU? Kept saying, 'Three top-10 wins."

Uhh, two of those "top-10 wins" are unranked Auburn and unranked Miami. They actually have 1 ranked win, Georgia, who has zero ranked wins but are still ranked in the top 10.

That's why these rankings are completely meaningless until the teams have played 6-7 games. The only reason these teams are so highly rated is because they started the year with a single digit next to their name.
Ken Carson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 184 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Super K » Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:06 pm

Ken Carson wrote:Anyone else see that bullshit note that ESPN kept attaching to LSU? Kept saying, 'Three top-10 wins."

Uhh, two of those "top-10 wins" are unranked Auburn and unranked Miami. They actually have 1 ranked win, Georgia, who has zero ranked wins but are still ranked in the top 10.

That's why these rankings are completely meaningless until the teams have played 6-7 games. The only reason these teams are so highly rated is because they started the year with a single digit next to their name.


I love this post...
User avatar
Super K
 
Posts: 7534
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 221 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Mountaineer Buc » Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:18 pm

Ken Carson wrote:Anyone else see that bullshit note that ESPN kept attaching to LSU? Kept saying, 'Three top-10 wins."

Uhh, two of those "top-10 wins" are unranked Auburn and unranked Miami. They actually have 1 ranked win, Georgia, who has zero ranked wins but are still ranked in the top 10.

That's why these rankings are completely meaningless until the teams have played 6-7 games. The only reason these teams are so highly rated is because they started the year with a single digit next to their name.

That's right.
Image
User avatar
Mountaineer Buc
 
Posts: 13817
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:15 pm
Location: Crestucky
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 644 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Zarniwoop » Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:21 pm

At the end of the year once enough games are played, they look at records against the current top 25, not what teams were ranked early in the season. Those early season effects go away over time. That’s one thing we have learned from the past 4 years, the committee is willing to move teams around even when they all win. They’ve done it every year.
Zarniwoop
 
Posts: 6476
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Ken Carson » Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:06 pm

Zarniwoop wrote:At the end of the year once enough games are played, they look at records against the current top 25, not what teams were ranked early in the season. Those early season effects go away over time. That’s one thing we have learned from the past 4 years, the committee is willing to move teams around even when they all win. They’ve done it every year.

Maybe, but for example, Texas has an inexcusable loss to Maryland on the ledger. A Maryland team that was blown out by a mid-tier American Conference team in Temple, no less.

This may sound like UCF homer sour grapes, but when Pitt plays ND like they did yesterday and you realize UCF beat that Pitt team by 31 points... hard for me to see how someone can justify ND being top 4 and UCF not moving despite 4 teams losing ahead of them.
Ken Carson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 184 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby NavyBuc » Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:49 pm

Ken Carson wrote:
Zarniwoop wrote:At the end of the year once enough games are played, they look at records against the current top 25, not what teams were ranked early in the season. Those early season effects go away over time. That’s one thing we have learned from the past 4 years, the committee is willing to move teams around even when they all win. They’ve done it every year.

Maybe, but for example, Texas has an inexcusable loss to Maryland on the ledger. A Maryland team that was blown out by a mid-tier American Conference team in Temple, no less.

This may sound like UCF homer sour grapes, but when Pitt plays ND like they did yesterday and you realize UCF beat that Pitt team by 31 points... hard for me to see how someone can justify ND being top 4 and UCF not moving despite 4 teams losing ahead of them.


Problem is UCF barely beat Memphis yesterday..... a team that lost to Tulane and Navy! I love my Middies, but we are absolute trash this year. That's not helping UCF's case. UCF is in a position where they need to destroy everyone because of the weakness of their schedule. And I like UCF. I would love to see them in the playoff. But after watching them yesterday, they're not top-4 material. And the rest of their schedule isn't going to do them any favors. I think even if they win out, they may not end up in top-10. The Playoff committee puts a lot of stock in quality of wins and UCF just doesn't have any nor will they at the end of the year. They need to schedule some stronger opponents out of conference or try and get in a power 5 conference.

The Committee poll in two weeks is always a lot different than the AP poll. It's going to look nothing like the AP. They put a TON of stock in quality of wins. And don't be surprised if they put UCF a lot further down than the AP Poll has them. If you beat a top-10 team, they elevate you a lot, which is why I tend to think Notre Dame, LSU and Texas are going to be ranked higher than people think. All 3 teams have wins over top-10 opponents.
NavyBuc
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:07 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Ken Carson » Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:11 pm

NavyBuc wrote:
Ken Carson wrote:Maybe, but for example, Texas has an inexcusable loss to Maryland on the ledger. A Maryland team that was blown out by a mid-tier American Conference team in Temple, no less.

This may sound like UCF homer sour grapes, but when Pitt plays ND like they did yesterday and you realize UCF beat that Pitt team by 31 points... hard for me to see how someone can justify ND being top 4 and UCF not moving despite 4 teams losing ahead of them.


Problem is UCF barely beat Memphis yesterday..... a team that lost to Tulane and Navy! I love my Middies, but we are absolute trash this year. That's not helping UCF's case. UCF is in a position where they need to destroy everyone because of the weakness of their schedule. And I like UCF. I would love to see them in the playoff. But after watching them yesterday, they're not top-4 material. And the rest of their schedule isn't going to do them any favors. I think even if they win out, they may not end up in top-10. The Playoff committee puts a lot of stock in quality of wins and UCF just doesn't have any nor will they at the end of the year. They need to schedule some stronger opponents out of conference or try and get in a power 5 conference.

The Committee poll in two weeks is always a lot different than the AP poll. It's going to look nothing like the AP. They put a TON of stock in quality of wins. And don't be surprised if they put UCF a lot further down than the AP Poll has them. If you beat a top-10 team, they elevate you a lot, which is why I tend to think Notre Dame, LSU and Texas are going to be ranked higher than people think. All 3 teams have wins over top-10 opponents.

Before yesterday’s game in a torrential downpour, UCF’s lowest margin of victory was 20 points. I seriously doubt you watched more than highlights of yesterday’s game. Weather is a huge equalizing factor, especially when one team is built around an uptempo offense.

That said, I still don’t see how you work around Pitt as a common opponent between UCF and ND. UCF was up 45-7 and put in the second team to end the game. ND needed the entire game to squeak out a 5 point win at home.

Hope Navy can do us a solid next week and knock off the Irish. Not that it will help the Knights in the eyes of people who can’t see past the logo on jerseys.
Ken Carson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 184 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby NavyBuc » Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:28 pm

Ken Carson wrote:
NavyBuc wrote:
Problem is UCF barely beat Memphis yesterday..... a team that lost to Tulane and Navy! I love my Middies, but we are absolute trash this year. That's not helping UCF's case. UCF is in a position where they need to destroy everyone because of the weakness of their schedule. And I like UCF. I would love to see them in the playoff. But after watching them yesterday, they're not top-4 material. And the rest of their schedule isn't going to do them any favors. I think even if they win out, they may not end up in top-10. The Playoff committee puts a lot of stock in quality of wins and UCF just doesn't have any nor will they at the end of the year. They need to schedule some stronger opponents out of conference or try and get in a power 5 conference.

The Committee poll in two weeks is always a lot different than the AP poll. It's going to look nothing like the AP. They put a TON of stock in quality of wins. And don't be surprised if they put UCF a lot further down than the AP Poll has them. If you beat a top-10 team, they elevate you a lot, which is why I tend to think Notre Dame, LSU and Texas are going to be ranked higher than people think. All 3 teams have wins over top-10 opponents.

Before yesterday’s game in a torrential downpour, UCF’s lowest margin of victory was 20 points. I seriously doubt you watched more than highlights of yesterday’s game. Weather is a huge equalizing factor, especially when one team is built around an uptempo offense.

That said, I still don’t see how you work around Pitt as a common opponent between UCF and ND. UCF was up 45-7 and put in the second team to end the game. ND needed the entire game to squeak out a 5 point win at home.

Hope Navy can do us a solid next week and knock off the Irish. Not that it will help the Knights in the eyes of people who can’t see past the logo on jerseys.


I actually watched the whole game. I think UCF's a decent team, but I want to see them against some quality teams in order to definitely say "they should be in the playoff". And winning by one against a "meh" Memphis team isn't really helping their case any, bad weather or not. If Memphis had any brains in the last 30 seconds there, they actually would have won. But like I said, I'm rooting for UCF. I would love to see them in the final 4. But I'm just stating what the committee is likely thinking.

As for ND, I think the Irish had a letdown game. They had two straight ranked opponents and took yesterday's game lightly and it nearly bit them, kinda like Syracuse nearly bit Clemson and Minnesota had OSU on the ropes for awhile. Those games happen. Problem is when you play a tougher schedule, you can afford some down games. For UCF, they need to blow everyone out and hope the top teams falter. I still think there's going to be a lot of chaos, though. I think the Irish could lose to an improving USC team on that last game of the year, I think Ohio State is going to get beat by someone (possibly Purdue next week) and Clemson has a couple tricky games left. Even Alabama, who has looked dominant, I think is going to have a test when they go to Baton Rouge at night in a few weeks. So crazy things could happen. Yesterday showed that. Outside of Alabama, I don't think there's really any great teams this year.
NavyBuc
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:07 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Zarniwoop » Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:41 pm

Sagarin has UCF’s SOS at 121st.

It will surely improve after they play UC and USF but I won’t be high enough to get them in unless there are 2 loss conference champs
Zarniwoop
 
Posts: 6476
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Ken Carson » Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:53 pm

For reasons I mentioned earlier, I don’t put any stock in SoS at this point in the season. Half of the games most teams have played are joke games against vastly inferior competition.

Navy, I also don’t get your logic. ND had a “down game” but UCF is “just decent?” Why doesn’t the team who has won 19 consecutive games get to have a “down game” on the road? You reference the Irish playing two “ranked” teams, except neither of those teams are even ranked anymore. And again, they’ve played a common opponent. UCF won by 26 more points and had 200 more yards of offense.
Ken Carson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 184 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby NavyBuc » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:08 am

Ken Carson wrote:For reasons I mentioned earlier, I don’t put any stock in SoS at this point in the season. Half of the games most teams have played are joke games against vastly inferior competition.

Navy, I also don’t get your logic. ND had a “down game” but UCF is “just decent?” Why doesn’t the team who has won 19 consecutive games get to have a “down game” on the road? You reference the Irish playing two “ranked” teams, except neither of those teams are even ranked anymore. And again, they’ve played a common opponent. UCF won by 26 more points and had 200 more yards of offense.


I'll make it simple: When you're comparing two undefeated teams in any scenario, and one has played the 121st ranked schedule and another has played the 12th ranked schedule, which team do you think the committee is going to put ahead?

My logic is this: If you play the 121st schedule in college football, you need to go undefeated and look impressive in every game doing so. If you play the 12th ranked schedule, you have more wiggle room as long as you win. 19 straight wins means absolutely nothing because we're talking about the 2018 season, not the 2017 one. And ND beat Stanford when they were in the top-10 with Bryce Love. They also beat Michigan who is in the top 10 now. The win at a ranked Va. Tech at the time was an okay win, but they beat them down pretty bad.

Things will play themselves out, though. I think ND and Ohio State are all going to lose down the stretch. I think even Bama may lose one with that game at LSU in a few weeks. I think Oklahoma, Michigan, Georgia and Texas will all lose again. There's going to be more carnage and UCF's schedule will get a little tougher as long as Cincinnati and USF keep winning. So let's let things play out before we panic about UCF not getting into the top-5 at the end of the year.
NavyBuc
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:07 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Zarniwoop » Mon Oct 15, 2018 8:12 am

everybody gets to have down games. now more than anything NCAA is simply about surviving your schedule....provided its a decent one.


i have had no beef with the top 4 selections since this thing began. I think the committee has done a great job of picking the teams. You can argue on the fringes (OSU getting in over TCU in year 1....OSU not getting in last year) but that will always happen. I simply haven't seen a clear cut error from them yet.

That being said, sometimes their "explanations" are a load of hogwash...and how they jump through hoops to justify their selections is completely unnecessary and has often come back to bite them in the butt.




There is a high probability that this year will work itself out too.
Zarniwoop
 
Posts: 6476
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Ken Carson » Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:53 pm

NavyBuc wrote:
Ken Carson wrote:For reasons I mentioned earlier, I don’t put any stock in SoS at this point in the season. Half of the games most teams have played are joke games against vastly inferior competition.

Navy, I also don’t get your logic. ND had a “down game” but UCF is “just decent?” Why doesn’t the team who has won 19 consecutive games get to have a “down game” on the road? You reference the Irish playing two “ranked” teams, except neither of those teams are even ranked anymore. And again, they’ve played a common opponent. UCF won by 26 more points and had 200 more yards of offense.


I'll make it simple: When you're comparing two undefeated teams in any scenario, and one has played the 121st ranked schedule and another has played the 12th ranked schedule, which team do you think the committee is going to put ahead?

My logic is this: If you play the 121st schedule in college football, you need to go undefeated and look impressive in every game doing so. If you play the 12th ranked schedule, you have more wiggle room as long as you win. 19 straight wins means absolutely nothing because we're talking about the 2018 season, not the 2017 one. And ND beat Stanford when they were in the top-10 with Bryce Love. They also beat Michigan who is in the top 10 now. The win at a ranked Va. Tech at the time was an okay win, but they beat them down pretty bad.

Things will play themselves out, though. I think ND and Ohio State are all going to lose down the stretch. I think even Bama may lose one with that game at LSU in a few weeks. I think Oklahoma, Michigan, Georgia and Texas will all lose again. There's going to be more carnage and UCF's schedule will get a little tougher as long as Cincinnati and USF keep winning. So let's let things play out before we panic about UCF not getting into the top-5 at the end of the year.

What forms the basis of the strength of a team’s schedule?
Ken Carson
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 184 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Zarniwoop » Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:57 pm

For Sagarin, which I quoted, it’s a combination of the win/loss record of your opponents and then their opponents. It has zero to do with human rankings.

He also does a SOS that is based on the difficulty a .500 team would have actually winning .500 of the games on a team’s schedule.


There is a very high correlation between the two measures
Zarniwoop
 
Posts: 6476
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Super K » Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:58 pm

Ken Carson wrote:
NavyBuc wrote:
I'll make it simple: When you're comparing two undefeated teams in any scenario, and one has played the 121st ranked schedule and another has played the 12th ranked schedule, which team do you think the committee is going to put ahead?

My logic is this: If you play the 121st schedule in college football, you need to go undefeated and look impressive in every game doing so. If you play the 12th ranked schedule, you have more wiggle room as long as you win. 19 straight wins means absolutely nothing because we're talking about the 2018 season, not the 2017 one. And ND beat Stanford when they were in the top-10 with Bryce Love. They also beat Michigan who is in the top 10 now. The win at a ranked Va. Tech at the time was an okay win, but they beat them down pretty bad.

Things will play themselves out, though. I think ND and Ohio State are all going to lose down the stretch. I think even Bama may lose one with that game at LSU in a few weeks. I think Oklahoma, Michigan, Georgia and Texas will all lose again. There's going to be more carnage and UCF's schedule will get a little tougher as long as Cincinnati and USF keep winning. So let's let things play out before we panic about UCF not getting into the top-5 at the end of the year.

What forms the basis of the strength of a team’s schedule?



Ooooooo, I know I know!!!


Shitty and biased pre-season rankings....
User avatar
Super K
 
Posts: 7534
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 221 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Zarniwoop » Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:00 pm

Super K wrote:
Ken Carson wrote:What forms the basis of the strength of a team’s schedule?



Ooooooo, I know I know!!!


Shitty and biased pre-season rankings....



I don’t know of a single computerized SOS that uses human rankings as an input.

If you can find some please link them ... I’d like to see how the ones that use human rankings compare to those that don’t
Zarniwoop
 
Posts: 6476
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Super K » Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:35 pm

Zarniwoop wrote:
Super K wrote:

Ooooooo, I know I know!!!


Shitty and biased pre-season rankings....



I don’t know of a single computerized SOS that uses human rankings as an input.

If you can find some please link them ... I’d like to see how the ones that use human rankings compare to those that don’t



Really?..I would've bet my life it was/is one if the variables...

So, essentially, losing to a 10-1 North Texas team is the same as losing against LSU?...(not being a ****, seriously asking)

Edit: btw, found the link below which states that SOS is, partly, calculated by wins against the committee's top 25 teams...

http://www.espn.com/college-football/st ... le-metrics
User avatar
Super K
 
Posts: 7534
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 221 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Zarniwoop » Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:52 pm

The 10-1 thing is why computers use opponents opponents record as well. A win over 10-1 UNT won’t be as impressive because the schools on UNTs schedule will have a worse record then those on say LSUs. (The SEC teams on LSUs schedule will all have very good OOC records....that won’t be true for UNTs)


That article does a good job showing just how holistically the committee tries to look at things. They even discuss how the hard number stuff is simply a starting point for the committee ... which is exactly how it should be.


Again, as far as I’m concerned they have done fine at picking out the top 4 since the new system started
Zarniwoop
 
Posts: 6476
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 330 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby uscbucsfan » Tue Oct 16, 2018 7:19 am

Not sure where to put this about Tua:

Through his first five games, he had a 95.5 QBR rating, the highest for any quarterback in the 15 seasons that the metric has been tracked. He has accounted for 23 touchdowns and has still yet to take a snap in the fourth quarter.


He's also yet to throw a pick. Bama without Tua is a top 4 team, but with him in the game they are on another planet outscoring opponents 238- 50. I've said it twice before, but it's like a cheat code for Bama to have the best QB in the game.

edit: Bama's offense with Tua in the game, without him playing 4th quarters or portions of the 3rd quarter, is the 6th best offense in the nation. Overall they are 1st by almost 2 points per game. Sorry I just keep hearing these ridiculous numbers. I'm sure they will drop off with their upcoming schedule, but he's running away with the Heisman as it is. He currently has 5/9 odds of winning it.
Last edited by uscbucsfan on Tue Oct 16, 2018 7:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
uscbucsfan
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 113 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby Kress » Tue Oct 16, 2018 7:27 am

Ken Carson wrote:Anyone else see that bullshit note that ESPN kept attaching to LSU? Kept saying, 'Three top-10 wins."

Uhh, two of those "top-10 wins" are unranked Auburn and unranked Miami. They actually have 1 ranked win, Georgia, who has zero ranked wins but are still ranked in the top 10.

That's why these rankings are completely meaningless until the teams have played 6-7 games. The only reason these teams are so highly rated is because they started the year with a single digit next to their name.



Exactly, and it works both ways. I am still hearing about how this week will be the first time all year that Clemson has played a ranked team. Never mind that they went to Texas A&M and beat them on their home field. That was too early, and A&M wasn't ranked yet. :roll:

But, at the end of the day rankings are all just fluff. Unless yours at the end of the season says 1, 2, 3, or 4, it doesn't make all that much difference. The bowls will do their conference matchups, and so on.
Image
User avatar
Kress
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:26 pm
Has thanked: 129 times
Been thanked: 249 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby DreadNaught » Tue Oct 16, 2018 7:41 am

Ken Carson wrote:That's why these rankings are completely meaningless until the teams have played 6-7 games. The only reason these teams are so highly rated is because they started the year with a single digit next to their name.


Yup, same as every year. Any rankings before the November are just fodder for fans to react to and drive conversation. They don't mean a damn thing.
Image
User avatar
DreadNaught
 
Posts: 13170
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:18 am
Has thanked: 541 times
Been thanked: 570 times

Re: College Football Playoff Selection

Postby NavyBuc » Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:17 am

DreadNaught wrote:
Ken Carson wrote:That's why these rankings are completely meaningless until the teams have played 6-7 games. The only reason these teams are so highly rated is because they started the year with a single digit next to their name.


Yup, same as every year. Any rankings before the November are just fodder for fans to react to and drive conversation. They don't mean a damn thing.


Agree. The one two weeks from today is really the first one that matters because then you start to see how the committee views these teams and if there's a chance for some of these teams to finish in the final 4. Like you'll get an idea if there's any chance for UCF to make the final 4 based on where the committee has them on Oct. 30. If they have them in the top 10, there's a chance, but if they have them like 16 or 17, forget it. But the AP/Coaches polls are meaningless right now.
NavyBuc
 
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:07 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 23 times

Previous

post

Return to College Football/Draft Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests