Cheb wrote:Well, this would certainly address our issues with speed, although every prospect is a bit raw.
At first glance, I like it. I'm at work right now, so I'll give a more informed opinion later. Suffice to say, this draft has potential.
Solid work, man.
real bucs fan wrote:I think Samuel is underrated, don't think he's far behind McCaffery as a weapon personally, but don't think he's an option at 19. Not a big fan of Adoree or Mack either.
Appreciate the originality though.
Alpha wrote:A few thoughts:
Samuel at 19 would be a massive reach. Nearly every source (Walter, NFL.com. CBS, etc.) has him as a 2nd round prospect. Granted...he could surprise but a massive reach none the less.
IF the draft were to fall this way, I like Adoree and Mack at 2 and 3. people who think Mack is a reach at 3 need to keep in mind where we're picking. He's probably a 4th rounder...but may not make it to 19. IF we like him, we may need to take him in the 3rd.
From what I've read (and heard locally), we seem to really like the TE out of Ashland. I've yet to see a mock with him in it. I've seen him going anywhere from the 2nd-4th rounds...
We have 2 QB's on the roster. We're either drafting one or bringing in a vet. As most of the back-up vets have been signed, my bet is we draft one. We've been linked to the kid out of Princeton. Been for a visit. He's talented but raw. (Torgenson or whatever his name is)...don't be surprised if we draft one late.
Mixed bag but nice effort. Personally, I really think (based on team visits/meetings/local talk) that we have 2 or 3 guys targeted at 19 and a slew of guys targeted based on a trade-down scenario. I'm looking for a trade down into the mid-low 20's, where guys like Samuel, Jackson and the like are more likely to be chosen and not as "reached" for.
Doctor wrote:Alpha wrote:A few thoughts:
Samuel at 19 would be a massive reach. Nearly every source (Walter, NFL.com. CBS, etc.) has him as a 2nd round prospect. Granted...he could surprise but a massive reach none the less.
IF the draft were to fall this way, I like Adoree and Mack at 2 and 3. people who think Mack is a reach at 3 need to keep in mind where we're picking. He's probably a 4th rounder...but may not make it to 19. IF we like him, we may need to take him in the 3rd.
From what I've read (and heard locally), we seem to really like the TE out of Ashland. I've yet to see a mock with him in it. I've seen him going anywhere from the 2nd-4th rounds...
We have 2 QB's on the roster. We're either drafting one or bringing in a vet. As most of the back-up vets have been signed, my bet is we draft one. We've been linked to the kid out of Princeton. Been for a visit. He's talented but raw. (Torgenson or whatever his name is)...don't be surprised if we draft one late.
Mixed bag but nice effort. Personally, I really think (based on team visits/meetings/local talk) that we have 2 or 3 guys targeted at 19 and a slew of guys targeted based on a trade-down scenario. I'm looking for a trade down into the mid-low 20's, where guys like Samuel, Jackson and the like are more likely to be chosen and not as "reached" for.
Apply that same Mack logic to the first round.
Doctor wrote:Alpha wrote:A few thoughts:
Samuel at 19 would be a massive reach. Nearly every source (Walter, NFL.com. CBS, etc.) has him as a 2nd round prospect. Granted...he could surprise but a massive reach none the less.
IF the draft were to fall this way, I like Adoree and Mack at 2 and 3. people who think Mack is a reach at 3 need to keep in mind where we're picking. He's probably a 4th rounder...but may not make it to 19. IF we like him, we may need to take him in the 3rd.
From what I've read (and heard locally), we seem to really like the TE out of Ashland. I've yet to see a mock with him in it. I've seen him going anywhere from the 2nd-4th rounds...
We have 2 QB's on the roster. We're either drafting one or bringing in a vet. As most of the back-up vets have been signed, my bet is we draft one. We've been linked to the kid out of Princeton. Been for a visit. He's talented but raw. (Torgenson or whatever his name is)...don't be surprised if we draft one late.
Mixed bag but nice effort. Personally, I really think (based on team visits/meetings/local talk) that we have 2 or 3 guys targeted at 19 and a slew of guys targeted based on a trade-down scenario. I'm looking for a trade down into the mid-low 20's, where guys like Samuel, Jackson and the like are more likely to be chosen and not as "reached" for.
Apply that same Mack logic to the first round. There are 31 picks between 19 and 50. If Litch wants Samuel he may not want to risk him not being there at 50, so you take him where you can. There are a slew of teams between our first two picks that can easily fall in love with a player like Samuel and it only takes one. Don't get me wrong, I think it's a massive reach too and he's not a top 20 player by any stretch. But this isn't a What Doc Wants mock, it's a prediction.
I love Adam Shaheen, I have him as the 3rd best TE ahead of Engram. I wanted to mock him in but I couldn't place him over Adoree' and while I would take him in the 3rd easily over Mack (if he were there), I don't think Litch agrees with me.
Alpha wrote:A few thoughts:
Samuel at 19 would be a massive reach. Nearly every source (Walter, NFL.com. CBS, etc.) has him as a 2nd round prospect. Granted...he could surprise but a massive reach none the less.
IF the draft were to fall this way, I like Adoree and Mack at 2 and 3. people who think Mack is a reach at 3 need to keep in mind where we're picking. He's probably a 4th rounder...but may not make it to 19. IF we like him, we may need to take him in the 3rd.
From what I've read (and heard locally), we seem to really like the TE out of Ashland. I've yet to see a mock with him in it. I've seen him going anywhere from the 2nd-4th rounds...
We have 2 QB's on the roster. We're either drafting one or bringing in a vet. As most of the back-up vets have been signed, my bet is we draft one. We've been linked to the kid out of Princeton. Been for a visit. He's talented but raw. (Torgenson or whatever his name is)...don't be surprised if we draft one late.
Mixed bag but nice effort. Personally, I really think (based on team visits/meetings/local talk) that we have 2 or 3 guys targeted at 19 and a slew of guys targeted based on a trade-down scenario. I'm looking for a trade down into the mid-low 20's, where guys like Samuel, Jackson and the like are more likely to be chosen and not as "reached" for.
Four Verticals wrote:Alpha wrote:A few thoughts:
Samuel at 19 would be a massive reach. Nearly every source (Walter, NFL.com. CBS, etc.) has him as a 2nd round prospect. Granted...he could surprise but a massive reach none the less.
IF the draft were to fall this way, I like Adoree and Mack at 2 and 3. people who think Mack is a reach at 3 need to keep in mind where we're picking. He's probably a 4th rounder...but may not make it to 19. IF we like him, we may need to take him in the 3rd.
From what I've read (and heard locally), we seem to really like the TE out of Ashland. I've yet to see a mock with him in it. I've seen him going anywhere from the 2nd-4th rounds...
We have 2 QB's on the roster. We're either drafting one or bringing in a vet. As most of the back-up vets have been signed, my bet is we draft one. We've been linked to the kid out of Princeton. Been for a visit. He's talented but raw. (Torgenson or whatever his name is)...don't be surprised if we draft one late.
Mixed bag but nice effort. Personally, I really think (based on team visits/meetings/local talk) that we have 2 or 3 guys targeted at 19 and a slew of guys targeted based on a trade-down scenario. I'm looking for a trade down into the mid-low 20's, where guys like Samuel, Jackson and the like are more likely to be chosen and not as "reached" for.
Ryan Griffin will likely be on the roster so there's really 3 QBs on the roster. I don't think they'll draft one but I guess it could happen.
GameTime wrote:Does shaheen have more in common with dexter jackson than adoree jackson? I would think so.
Alpha wrote:GameTime wrote:Does shaheen have more in common with dexter jackson than adoree jackson? I would think so.
WTF does this even mean?
Stay off the drugs kid. They're bad. Mmmkay?
Return to College Football/Draft Talk
Users browsing this forum: Bootz2004, Naismith, theBKwhopper and 13 guests