MJW wrote:In a vacuum? I'd agree with you. He doesn't DESERVE anything like that.
But keep something in mind: If we didn't know him so well, how attractive would he seem on the open market? Didn't someone point out that he's in his mid-twenties, in the top five in the league in passing yards and TDs, etc, etc?
On the open market, that gets overpaid. If he decides he wants to test the market, that's what he's looking at - $30 mil APY. For the same reasons that we paid Donovan Smith $14 mil APY when he's terrible.
Some bad, QB needy team will give him that money. We're a bad, QB needy team WITH the home-field advantage.
MJW wrote:Buc2 wrote:I've said since this thread began that JW will be here next year. He'll also be the starter next year. Whine, bitch, moan all you want. Y'all keep arguing the same exact points day after day. Page after page. Post after post. It does not matter. He will be our Buccaneers starting QB next September (barring injury of course).
Come on. Let's hear some more reasons why he shouldn't be. Oh. Wait. That's already been said, ad nauseum, over the past 16 pages of this thread alone.![]()
This is true.
I'm already excited for next year's batch of excuses for when he's the exact same QB he's been since college.
BJJ34 wrote:I know there is no way the Ravens trade him, but McSorley could rip this league up with the right weapons.
Doctor wrote:I could get behind $30M on what essentially a series of franchise tags. Holy hell, MJW, are you being reasonable!?
Doctor wrote:The important part is that it doesn't leave us with our ass hanging out if we don't land our QB. Fans fail to comprehend that FO don't just "take the next best QB" on the board. That's not how that works. There are usually one, maybe two or three, QBs you really like or believe in as a front office in the draft. If for whatever reason the draft falls in a way where they aren't there when we go to pick, then the FO will just not get a QB that draft. QB is not really a "settle for" position. And if that happens we'll be stuck with either a $12M journeyman Fitpatrick type or an unknown why the hell not Finley type for the year. No thanks. Maybe we get lucky, sure, but no thanks.
MJW wrote:and then we wonder why we suck.
NavyBuc wrote:Bringing Winston back for another year is telling the fans of the Tampa Bay Bucs “We are fine with being okay.” Might as well do a commercial on the Bucs ownership for AT&T.
Once upon a time we fired coaches for not advancing in the playoffs (Dungy/Gruden). Now we are happy if we can get to 8-8. Hell, Winston may get a 5-year contract if we go 8-8.
Doctor wrote:NavyBuc wrote:Bringing Winston back for another year is telling the fans of the Tampa Bay Bucs “We are fine with being okay.” Might as well do a commercial on the Bucs ownership for AT&T.
Once upon a time we fired coaches for not advancing in the playoffs (Dungy/Gruden). Now we are happy if we can get to 8-8. Hell, Winston may get a 5-year contract if we go 8-8.
The idea is that you aren't staying put at 8-8.
Not to mention if the coach that took a team consistently sucky team and made it into a .500 team on his first year says "Hey, I can win with this", I'm gonna ****ing believe him.
Caradoc wrote:Doctor wrote:The idea is that you aren't staying put at 8-8.
Not to mention if the coach that took a team consistently sucky team and made it into a .500 team on his first year says "Hey, I can win with this", I'm gonna ****ing believe him.
If you come in as a new regime and overhaul things, and after a rough adjustment starts you 2-6 but you finish the next half of the season 6-2, you are going to believe you have the pieces in place to have a legit shot at being at least a playoff contender - that 6-2 should be more reflective of the team you are fielding next year than the 2-6 start should be.
Bringing Winston back would be an outspring from that, too bad if the fans can't see it - or, more appropriately, don't want to see it. When the winning comes they will just have to deal with it. I'm expect that if that is what happens a lot of posters here are just going to disappear. for a while.
MJW wrote:Caradoc wrote:
If you come in as a new regime and overhaul things, and after a rough adjustment starts you 2-6 but you finish the next half of the season 6-2, you are going to believe you have the pieces in place to have a legit shot at being at least a playoff contender - that 6-2 should be more reflective of the team you are fielding next year than the 2-6 start should be.
Bringing Winston back would be an outspring from that, too bad if the fans can't see it - or, more appropriately, don't want to see it. When the winning comes they will just have to deal with it. I'm expect that if that is what happens a lot of posters here are just going to disappear. for a while.
Imagine thinking that four good games means more than four plus bad seasons.
Oh, I forgot, Winston has a clean slate, and we're forgetting about his problems his last year at FSU...followed by how he had the same problems under Lovie...then Koetter...then literally until the 2nd quarter of the game two weeks ago. That's all meaningless.
Again, we should never wonder why we suck.
Jonny wrote:As bad as Winston is, I still don't think there are that many QBs clearly better than him..... If I am the Glazers I am not moving on from Winston just to make a point that we can do better. .
Jonny wrote:Baker was this off season's darling, but almost every game he looks like Winston at his worst.
NYBF wrote:Jonny wrote:Baker was this off season's darling, but almost every game he looks like Winston at his worst.
This is Baker's 2nd season.
PetePierson wrote:Jonny wrote:As bad as Winston is, I still don't think there are that many QBs clearly better than him..... If I am the Glazers I am not moving on from Winston just to make a point that we can do better. .
I think this is MJM's main issue (to which I agree); at some point the Brothers' Glazer need to stop making / not making decisions out of fear. Maintaining a losing status quo because you are scared it may not be better is not how competent franchises or businesses operate.
Queue the definition of insanity quote.
Patrick McIrish wrote:uscbucsfan wrote:Even you jumped off the Winston bandwagon earlier. Funny how wins make people forget.
Wins DO matter. I know you didn't post this to me but to pretend winning isn't going to change some perspectives is foolish.
Are they end all? Of course not. You have to look at everything.
While it can be silly to put too much into a player playing basically in his contract year.......
It's also silly to pretend the last 1.5 years (at least) he's been trying to win with a defense that was absolutely pathetic.
I'm not in the sign Winston camp yet but I am in the "I'm going to keep options open" the last few games of the season.
I mean the first question is price.
If you or anyone tells me there is NO PRICE at which they would keep him I'm going it dismiss that opinion out of ignorance.uscbucsfan wrote:Literally everyone called that he would make a decent/mediocre run at the end of the season when the playoffs were basically out of reach.
Fair point here. I've said that many times including this year.
You want to see best Winston wait until there's nothing left to play for..... preseason and after playoff contention this kid shines, LOL.
I still think the decision is getting tougher, I say that because I do see him throwing the ball away more. I have seen less "hero ball" of late.
Yes, labeled the biggest Winston hater on the board since he arrived but situations change.....
The more you adapt in life, the better it is for you. What was horrible in the past may be more conducive moving forward.
A 25 year old QB with 5 full seasons of playing time is not something you send packing without a lot of soul searching.......
Especially with the defense playing better and the team winning down the stretch.
Those two things continue and it could play very big into all this.uscbucsfan wrote:He's still not a top 15 or even top 20 QB in the NFL.
I think he's a top 20 QB for sure, and no I would trade him for that Minchew idiot in Jax.
We move on.
NavyBuc wrote:Bringing Winston back for another year is telling the fans of the Tampa Bay Bucs “We are fine with being okay.” Might as well do a commercial on the Bucs ownership for AT&T.
Once upon a time we fired coaches for not advancing in the playoffs (Dungy/Gruden). Now we are happy if we can get to 8-8. Hell, Winston may get a 5-year contract if we go 8-8.
Bruce Arians on whether he would recommend to owners that Jameis Winston return for 2020: "I'm going to pass on that one. I'm going to wait until the end of December. There's been really, really good and there's been some really, really bad...''
DreadNaught wrote:Bruce Arians on whether he would recommend to owners that Jameis Winston return for 2020: "I'm going to pass on that one. I'm going to wait until the end of December. There's been really, really good and there's been some really, really bad...''
Mex-Buc wrote:DreadNaught wrote:
This quote is very surprising, first time he is not defending Jameis...
DreadNaught wrote:Bruce Arians on whether he would recommend to owners that Jameis Winston return for 2020: "I'm going to pass on that one. I'm going to wait until the end of December. There's been really, really good and there's been some really, really bad...''
BacksidePursuit wrote:BA is a straight shooter at least. Compare it to the off-season, that’s a man who has definitely just gone through 12 games of the Winston experience.
Snake wrote:Somehow Arians will be blamed for undermining Jameis’s confidence if/when he implodes.
Snake wrote:Somehow Arians will be blamed for undermining Jameis’s confidence if/when he implodes.
Users browsing this forum: BacksidePursuit, Cheb, Google [Bot], Naismith, Nano, viva la Reagan and 21 guests