The Outsider wrote:I know the whole first verse and I can't recall ever singing the song in my life. I don't know if this means there's something wrong with all of you or if I was involved in a CIA psy-op involving God Bless America at some time in my past.
sanka wrote:Well done to the eagles for giving Trump the middle finger. You call them sons of bitches and you expect them to come and kiss your ass? **** you
MJW wrote:sanka wrote:Well done to the eagles for giving Trump the middle finger. You call them sons of bitches and you expect them to come and kiss your ass? **** you
I don't think either party covered themselves in glory with this. The Eagles should be called out for that eye-rolling, "We were totally going to volunteer while we were in DC and now we're not!" nonsense.
The difference is, one party is The President Of The United States Of America, which is to say, should be held to a higher standard than literally everyone else. At least, that's how I remember things being until around 1993.
BucaRican wrote:MJW wrote:
I don't think either party covered themselves in glory with this. The Eagles should be called out for that eye-rolling, "We were totally going to volunteer while we were in DC and now we're not!" nonsense.
The difference is, one party is The President Of The United States Of America, which is to say, should be held to a higher standard than literally everyone else. At least, that's how I remember things being until around 1993.
How ???? It has always been a invitation.... People decided not to show-up to see Obama after championships, but this presidents ego has influenced everything he has done. He is infatuated with crowd sizes.... If 8 players decided to go then allow the 8 players to go. Don't cancel a visit because the majority don't agree with you. It was a bad bad move.
The Eagles owner wanted to attend and so did some staff, but the African-American players in majority stood together. The irony is, the Eagles did not Kneel during the regular season. Political ploy for mid-term election is on from this president.
Something is going to happen before game 1, trust me the players are not showing the poker hand they are going to play.
BucaRican wrote:MJW wrote:
I don't think either party covered themselves in glory with this. The Eagles should be called out for that eye-rolling, "We were totally going to volunteer while we were in DC and now we're not!" nonsense.
The difference is, one party is The President Of The United States Of America, which is to say, should be held to a higher standard than literally everyone else. At least, that's how I remember things being until around 1993.
How ???? It has always been a invitation.... People decided not to show-up to see Obama after championships, but this presidents ego has influenced everything he has done. He is infatuated with crowd sizes.... If 8 players decided to go then allow the 8 players to go. Don't cancel a visit because the majority don't agree with you. It was a bad bad move.
The Eagles owner wanted to attend and so did some staff, but the African-American players in majority stood together. The irony is, the Eagles did not Kneel during the regular season. Political ploy for mid-term election is on from this president.
Something is going to happen before game 1, trust me the players are not showing the poker hand they are going to play.
Buc2 wrote:BucaRican wrote:
How ???? It has always been a invitation.... People decided not to show-up to see Obama after championships, but this presidents ego has influenced everything he has done. He is infatuated with crowd sizes.... If 8 players decided to go then allow the 8 players to go. Don't cancel a visit because the majority don't agree with you. It was a bad bad move.
The Eagles owner wanted to attend and so did some staff, but the African-American players in majority stood together. The irony is, the Eagles did not Kneel during the regular season. Political ploy for mid-term election is on from this president.
Something is going to happen before game 1, trust me the players are not showing the poker hand they are going to play.
So you'd have me believe that if only 8 of 53 players from a team said they would attend the event and the other 45 said they wouldn't because they didn't like or agree with Obama, you'd have been upset had Obama cancelled the event? I call bs.
BucaRican wrote:Buc2 wrote:So you'd have me believe that if only 8 of 53 players from a team said they would attend the event and the other 45 said they wouldn't because they didn't like or agree with Obama, you'd have been upset had Obama cancelled the event? I call bs.
Obama would not have cancel #1 no matter how many people decide to come, #2 Obama would acknowledge the freedom of speech displayed by the players, #3 Obama would have not forced fed the unpatriotic narrative coming from the White House. This has to do with the President of the United States influencing A false narrative, and amplifying it by lying about the Eagles visit in his latest charades.
Buc2 wrote:BucaRican wrote:
Obama would not have cancel #1 no matter how many people decide to come, #2 Obama would acknowledge the freedom of speech displayed by the players, #3 Obama would have not forced fed the unpatriotic narrative coming from the White House. This has to do with the President of the United States influencing A false narrative, and amplifying it by lying about the Eagles visit in his latest charades.
Sure. Whatever. But if he had, you'd have been pissed at him. Right? Give me a break.
BucaRican wrote:Buc2 wrote:Sure. Whatever. But if he had, you'd have been pissed at him. Right? Give me a break.
We don't deal in shoulda could haves, the fact is what it is at the moment, and on several issues I was pissed with Obama. Doesn't change the fact that this President lies daily, and force feeds information.
Rocker wrote:The Outsider wrote:I know the whole first verse and I can't recall ever singing the song in my life. I don't know if this means there's something wrong with all of you or if I was involved in a CIA psy-op involving God Bless America at some time in my past.
Imagine listening to God Bless America and trying to sync it up with “Baby Shark” because your children are heartless demons and demand that song on repeat.
Buc2 wrote:BucaRican wrote:
Obama would not have cancel #1 no matter how many people decide to come, #2 Obama would acknowledge the freedom of speech displayed by the players, #3 Obama would have not forced fed the unpatriotic narrative coming from the White House. This has to do with the President of the United States influencing A false narrative, and amplifying it by lying about the Eagles visit in his latest charades.
Sure. Whatever. But if he had, you'd have been pissed at him. Right? Give me a break.
BucaRican wrote:MJW wrote:
I don't think either party covered themselves in glory with this. The Eagles should be called out for that eye-rolling, "We were totally going to volunteer while we were in DC and now we're not!" nonsense.
The difference is, one party is The President Of The United States Of America, which is to say, should be held to a higher standard than literally everyone else. At least, that's how I remember things being until around 1993.
How ????
RedLeader wrote:And where the **** is Kaep in all of this? Did that ****er go radio silent now, or am i just not seeing it... lol.
NYBF wrote:RedLeader wrote:And where the **** is Kaep in all of this? Did that ****er go radio silent now, or am i just not seeing it... lol.
When Kaep makes noise, he should shut the **** up.
When something that has absolutely nothing to do with Kaep is going on, he should be making noise?
Why? So you can tell him to shut the **** up?
NYBF wrote:RedLeader wrote:And where the **** is Kaep in all of this? Did that ****er go radio silent now, or am i just not seeing it... lol.
When Kaep makes noise, he should shut the **** up.
When something that has absolutely nothing to do with Kaep is going on, he should be making noise?
Why? So you can tell him to shut the **** up?
Ken Carson wrote:NYBF wrote:
When Kaep makes noise, he should shut the **** up.
When something that has absolutely nothing to do with Kaep is going on, he should be making noise?
Why? So you can tell him to shut the **** up?
Before you accuse him of inconsistency, he also holds the opinion that Kaep doesn’t actually believe in his causes and only took a knee to be popular, despite public records of over $1 million in Kaepernick donations.
NYBF wrote:RedLeader wrote:And where the **** is Kaep in all of this? Did that ****er go radio silent now, or am i just not seeing it... lol.
When Kaep makes noise, he should shut the **** up.
When something that has absolutely nothing to do with Kaep is going on, he should be making noise?
Why? So you can tell him to shut the **** up?
Ken Carson wrote:NYBF wrote:
When Kaep makes noise, he should shut the **** up.
When something that has absolutely nothing to do with Kaep is going on, he should be making noise?
Why? So you can tell him to shut the **** up?
Before you accuse him of inconsistency, he also holds the opinion that Kaep doesn’t actually believe in his causes and only took a knee to be popular, despite public records of over $1 million in Kaepernick donations.
RedLeader wrote:Ken Carson wrote:Before you accuse him of inconsistency, he also holds the opinion that Kaep doesn’t actually believe in his causes and only took a knee to be popular, despite public records of over $1 million in Kaepernick donations.
Also, i think you’re confusing me with someone else. I’ve never said any of that. Lol.
I’ve just alays said its a shame Kaep and Co have thoroughly wasted an opportunity to effect some actual, long-lasting change.
You cant just throw a few dollars (relatively speaking) at the problem, and then just hold your breath and stomp your feet forever.
Okay. We get it. There seems to be a problem with .05 percent of the law enforcement community in some areas. Thank you. Now, how do we fix it?
Just saying. You guys should be demanding more from your leader.
Mlk knew he couldnt just march forever.
Ken Carson wrote:RedLeader wrote:
Also, i think you’re confusing me with someone else. I’ve never said any of that. Lol.
I’ve just alays said its a shame Kaep and Co have thoroughly wasted an opportunity to effect some actual, long-lasting change.
You cant just throw a few dollars (relatively speaking) at the problem, and then just hold your breath and stomp your feet forever.
Okay. We get it. There seems to be a problem with .05 percent of the law enforcement community in some areas. Thank you. Now, how do we fix it?
Just saying. You guys should be demanding more from your leader.
Mlk knew he couldnt just march forever.
Do you honestly think only 0.5% of LE treat black and Latino people differently than they treat white people? Is that truly what you think?
DreadNaught wrote:Ken Carson wrote:Do you honestly think only 0.5% of LE treat black and Latino people differently than they treat white people? Is that truly what you think?
1/200?
Given the number of incidents and the more 1 millions LEO's I think the number could be smaller. I'd be interested why you believe the number should be bigger? I'm not sure how we're connecting a relatively very small number of incidents (compared to the # of LEOs and their daily interactions) to saying over 6000 LEOs act in some type of racial bias in the course of their duty.
Perhaps we should start by defining 'treat differently'.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests