NFL to review Matt Patricia's 1996 sex assault charge

Team Discussions regarding games, players, coaches, or anything else related to Buccaneer Football.
post

Re: NFL to review Matt Patricia's 1996 sex assault charge

Postby uscbucsfan » Fri May 11, 2018 8:58 am

NYBF wrote:
PrimeMinister wrote:
The problem is definitive conclusions rarely happen and the current political climate assumes guilty unless proven innocent. Matt Patricia may have never done anything wrong, but “possible sexual predator” will hang over his head unless he has definitive proof from 22 years ago.


I don't think that's true at all, but if it is, it would be an improvement over the "**** him he's guilty regardless of the outcome of the trial" views that have been held nationally in the past.


Is this your way of saying you side with OJ?
Image
User avatar
uscbucsfan
 
Posts: 3907
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: NFL to review Matt Patricia's 1996 sex assault charge

Postby Mountaineer Buc » Fri May 11, 2018 1:04 pm

NYBF wrote:
uscbucsfan wrote:
Is this your way of saying you side with OJ?


Who did OJ rape?

Everyone when he made Capricorn 1
Image
User avatar
Mountaineer Buc
 
Posts: 11552
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:15 pm
Location: Crestucky
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 579 times

Re: NFL to review Matt Patricia's 1996 sex assault charge

Postby Deuce » Fri May 11, 2018 2:26 pm

uscbucsfan wrote:
NYBF wrote:
I don't think that's true at all, but if it is, it would be an improvement over the "**** him he's guilty regardless of the outcome of the trial" views that have been held nationally in the past.


Is this your way of saying you side with OJ?


Is this a question or another fruit/veggie pun?
User avatar
Deuce
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 7:23 pm
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Previous

post

Return to Team Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bootz2004, Google [Bot], PlinkoBuccaneer and 13 guests