Bootz2004 wrote:Pamphile is a UFA
Bootz2004 wrote:UFA:
-----
Brent Grimes CB
Clinton McDonald DT
Sealver Siliga DT
Keith Tandy FS
Adam Gettis G
Robert McClain CB
Charles Sims RB
Kevin Pamphile G
RFA:
-----
Adarius Glanton OLB
Cameron Brate TE
Jude Adjei-Barimah CB
Adam Humphries WR
Ryan Russell. DE
ERFA:
-----
Peyton Barber RB
Patrick Murray K
Javien Elliott CB
DreadNaught wrote:Grimes is the only guy that will command any type of expensive contract.
All the rest of the UFA's could be re-signed for very cheap deals. So I don't have an issue retaining depth if they have a role to fill.
All the RFA's and ERFA's will be back for initial 90 man offseason/training camp roster. Brate will be interesting since he'll require a higher tender than the others, but he more than deserves to get a pay raise considering he's been a league minimum guy since he's been in the NFL.
DreadNaught wrote:Grimes is the only guy that will command any type of expensive contract.
All the rest of the UFA's could be re-signed for very cheap deals. So I don't have an issue retaining depth if they have a role to fill.
All the RFA's and ERFA's will be back for initial 90 man offseason/training camp roster. Brate will be interesting since he'll require a higher tender than the others, but he more than deserves to get a pay raise considering he's been a league minimum guy since he's been in the NFL.
mdb1958 wrote:MB, put a link on how to get that line through the words thing.
Mountaineer Buc wrote:mdb1958 wrote:MB, put a link on how to get that line through the words thing.
It's the little button between "Font colour" and "spoiler"
the one with the s on it.
highlight what you want to strike through and click that little button.
You got this. I believe in you
mdb1958 wrote:Mountaineer Buc wrote:It's the little button between "Font colour" and "spoiler"
the one with the s on it.
highlight what you want to strike through and click that little button.
You got this. I believe in you
I had been taught sumthin, thx
wait for it
Mountaineer Buc wrote:DreadNaught wrote:Grimes is the only guy that will command any type of expensive contract.
All the rest of the UFA's could be re-signed for very cheap deals. So I don't have an issue retaining depth if they have a role to fill.
All the RFA's and ERFA's will be back for initial 90 man offseason/training camp roster. Brate will be interesting since he'll require a higher tender than the others, but he more than deserves to get a pay raise considering he's been a league minimum guy since he's been in the NFL.
Yup. I don't see the need to do a complete overhaul of the roster. But there are guys who have demonstrated they aren't part of the solution.
MJW wrote:Mountaineer Buc wrote:Yup. I don't see the need to do a complete overhaul of the roster. But there are guys who have demonstrated they aren't part of the solution.
Yeah, when you're 5-11, you really don't want to make any unnecessary coaching, play-calling, or personnel changes. It's the Koetter way!
Mountaineer Buc wrote:MJW wrote:
Yeah, when you're 5-11, you really don't want to make any unnecessary coaching, play-calling, or personnel changes. It's the Koetter way!
I was talking about players, not coaches. My GM hat is about improving the overall talent on the roster. I just don't think a slash and burn is called for just yet.
Sammich wrote:The problem with a slash and burn is that you can make yourself worse. My MO would be to keep everyone until you have a better option or a positive trade offer. Find a new end? Cut your worst end. Find a new guard? Cut you worst guard. Etc, etc.
Unless they demand an unreasonable contract or are a cancer in the locker room I see no reason to ever cut a player until you have an upgrade lined up.
Bootz2004 wrote:Sammich wrote:The problem with a slash and burn is that you can make yourself worse. My MO would be to keep everyone until you have a better option or a positive trade offer. Find a new end? Cut your worst end. Find a new guard? Cut you worst guard. Etc, etc.
Unless they demand an unreasonable contract or are a cancer in the locker room I see no reason to ever cut a player until you have an upgrade lined up.
This. And with the way we structure contracts getting out of deals isn't that difficult. Take Joe Hawley and Evan Smith. Everyone hated them at the end of 2016. But we kept them both. Injuries hit and they had to step up. Now if this was Mark Dominik that would've been 2 UDFA rookies starting for us in place of Marpet and Sweezy. The only time Licht has really moved on from a player still under contract is if they make an insane amount of money(Revis), they make a decent amount of money but lost a starting job(Verner) or like you said find an upgrade (McDougald/Wilcox). I don't think we've ever gone into the draft NEEDING a specific position except 2015.
Defense5599 wrote:UFA:
-----
Brent Grimes CB- Bring him back but on a prove it deal
DanTurksGhost wrote:Grimes is a must re-sign, unless we get Malcolm Butler or something. If we lose Grimes and don't replace him with TWO quality starters, we're screwed.
DanTurksGhost wrote:Grimes is a must re-sign, unless we get Malcolm Butler or something. If we lose Grimes and don't replace him with TWO quality starters, we're screwed.
Users browsing this forum: .irishHITMAN4rent, Baidu [Spider], DominatingD55, Fiasco, Noles1724 and 15 guests